Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to the Journal undergo an initial screening by the Editorial Office, normally within one week of receipt. This screening assesses the manuscript’s suitability for the Journal, language quality, and compliance with submission requirements. Manuscripts are also screened for textual similarity and potential plagiarism.
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two reviewers for peer review, which normally takes one month. The Editor-in-Chief then makes a decision based on the reviewers’ reports, normally within one week of receiving them. The process generally takes approximately six weeks, although additional time may be required for revisions or further review.
Type of Peer Review
The Journal follows a double-blind peer-review process, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the review process.
Peer Review Criteria
Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two reviewers and checked for language quality and consistency. Publication decisions are based on the manuscript’s originality, theoretical and practical significance, quality of content, and clarity of presentation.
